8 Unknown Facts About Anne Frank's Popular Diary

• 11:56 pm July 10, 2022

Most students have perused The Diary of Anne Frank; it's a smash hit and significant piece of history. Whether it's seen as a sign of the Holocaust or as the noteworthy works of a growing literary talent, the story behind Anne Frank's journal is brimming with debate, some of which is as yet unfurling. In 2022, for instance, researchers declared they might find who betrayed Anne Frank's family to authorities: Jewish notary Arnold van den Bergh.

In her diaries, Anne includes facts about her birth in Germany in 1929, details about her family's move to Amsterdam as Hitler came to power, and reflections on hiding with seven other people in a secret annex.

There Are Actually Three Versions Of Anne's Diary

Now here is something extremely interesting about a super historical fact. Anne started writing in her diary as a method for adapting to her circumstance and have a space to share her contemplations without judgment. She noticed, "My diary and the secrets I share with my friends are none of [my family's] business."

She began writing in a red- and green-checkered journal given to her as a gift for her 13th birthday. Once full, she continued in other notebooks. Around 1944, the family caught a radio broadcast urging citizens to keep written accounts of happenings during the war. Anne decided to turn her diaries into a novel called The Secret Annex. She then started a new notebook to polish her previous diary by rewriting and editing it for print.

Anne wrote 324 pages of the new book before Nazis discovered the family in hiding. When Otto Frank obtained the diaries after the war, he wanted to fulfil his daughter's wish to see them published. He compiled her work into a third book, but he edited Anne's words to cut out several mentions of sex, puberty, and writings likely to hurt the family's reputation.

Otto Frank Omitted Five Pages From The Diary

In 1998, the director of the Anne Frank Center, Cornelis Suijk, encountered five loose pages he guaranteed Otto Frank omitted from Anne's distributed diary. Otto gave them to Sujik for care before he passed on.

The pages were possible left out on the grounds that Anne used them to voice anger at her mom and her folks' relationship. Suijk lent the pages to author Melissa Muller, who was currently making an Anne Frank biography. She was subsequently told, notwithstanding, she couldn't directly quote the diary, as it's considered breaking copyright law.

The pages also caused a conflict between organizations: the Anne Frank Fonds, which is a Switzerland-based foundation holding the copyright on the published book, and the Netherlands State Institute for War Documentation, to which Otto gave custody of the diaries. The Anne Frank Fonds asserted Suijk acted illegally. In turn, Suijk accused the foundation of profiting off Anne, while not sharing the money with other Anne Frank–related causes, such as his own.

The European Copyright On The Book Limits Readers' Access

Under copyrights law in Europe, works enter the public domain 70 years after the maker's death, initially booked for 2016 on account of Anne's journal. Notwithstanding, the nonprofit holding the copyright, the Anne Frank Fonds, claimed Otto Frank altered the original copy fundamentally, so he basically made another book and could be named as a co-writer. Since Otto died in 1980, the proviso permitted them to stretch out the copyright in Europe to 2050.

The foundation claimed they extended the copyright to ensure the book wouldn't be commercially exploited in the form of merchandise with Anne's quotes, for example. Because earnings from book sales go to several children's charities, however, some people believe the foundation mainly wants the money from retaining the copyright.

There are also concerns the book will have a limited number of readers since it's only available commercially. Others suggested if Anne is a co-author, it may be implied the words and thoughts on the page are not hers alone.

Neither Anne's Museum Nor A Biographer Were Allowed To Use Her Exact Words

Anne Frank Fond's hold on the diary's copyright regulates how much others can use Anne's words and this is a true fact. Historians and members of the Anne Frank House in Amsterdam raised concerns about how visitors to the museum could only honor Anne in restricted ways due to the possibility of a copyright lawsuit. One historian summed up the argument up by saying, "It belongs in the public domain. It is part of our collective memory and heritage." Sounds super interesting, right?

An Anne Frank biographer wasn't allowed to use Anne's exact words from her diary because she didn't have permission. Additionally, at least two plays adapted from the diary weren't allowed to use direct quotes.

Anne Wrote About Her Body And Her Period, But That Was Edited By Her Father For The Readers

When Anne's father edited her diaries into book form, he left out multiple references to sex, female anatomy, and menstruation. It is not certain why Otto Frank edited these pieces out, but through these missing passages, the reader can see Anne as a more humanized teenage girl. Or maybe the society perhaps?

Anne learned about anatomy by exploring her body and wrote about her vagina. She commented, "There are little folds of skin all over the place, you can hardly find it. The little hole underneath is so terribly small that I simply can't imagine how a man can get in there, let alone how a whole baby can get out!"

Anne's mentions of her period were also edited out by her father. Lines like, "PS. I forgot to mention the important news that I'm probably going to get my period soon. I can tell because I keep finding a whitish smear in my panties," were cut from the text. She also reflected on conversations she had with Peter van Pels regarding the names of male and female genitals.
,br> More than 60 years later, after publishing a version of the book with those unedited passages, one mother complained to her daughter's school about how Anne's diaries made her child feel uncomfortable, confirming Otto's fears about the content.

Otto Frank Omitted Anne's Criticism Of His Marriage

On the loose pages omitted by Otto Frank from the first published book, Anne writes about her parents' marriage and the relationship between her mother and father. According to the family's backstory, Otto was unable to marry the woman he truly loved. Her parents barred him from wedding Otto for financial reasons, so Otto married Anne's mother, Edith, half-heartedly. "For a woman in love it cannot be easy to know that she will never occupy the first place in her husband's heart, and mother knew," Anne wrote.

Although Anne admitted to not knowing the full story, her father's attitude toward her mother gave her clues. She wrote, "He deemed her the right person to be his wife." To save both Edith's reputation and his own, Otto purposely left these sentiments out of the book.